Search Archives:

Custom Search
Showing posts with label Vietnam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vietnam. Show all posts

Friday, August 22, 2008

McCain's POW Crutch

Did you know John McCain was a POW during the Vietnam war? It's probably not widely known, since he never talks about it, preferring instead to keep his POW light under a bushel. In fact, you can't even ask him about his POW status or he gets irritated. When Gen. Wesley Clark brought up the fact that being shot down over Vietnam doesn't automatically qualify you for the presidency, McCain was annoyed.

ABC News gives us this glimpse from an appearance on Face the Nation:

"I think it’s up to Sen. Obama now not only to repudiate [Clark] but to cut him loose," McCain said.

McCain became visibly angry when I asked him to explain how his Vietnam experience prepared him for the Presidency.

"Please," he said, recoiling back in his seat in distaste at the very question.


See? He doesn't like to talk about it, which is probably why you didn't know he was a POW.



Of course, there was his first general election ad -- which was about the fact that John McCain was a POW. Before that, there was an ad attacking Hillary Clinton for supporting a Woodstock concert museum. "I’m sure it was a cultural and pharmaceutical event," McCain says in the ad. "I was tied up at the time."

Then there was "Love," an ad where McCain oddly runs against hippies who partied while he was "Shot down. Bayoneted. Tortured." And "Safe," where he talks about how much he hates war -- see, he was "shot down over Vietnam and spent five years as a POW." Or "Service," an ad that tells us that McCain is principled because he went to Annapolis and a "calamity of fate delivered him to North Vietnam."

But other than that McCain doesn't make a big deal out of being a POW, right? I mean, that'd be using his experience as a political crutch, as training wheels to keep his campaign from tipping over into the rosebushes. He wouldn't do that, would he? All them terr'ists and Iranians and Vladimir Putins wouldn't care much whether or not he was a POW, so it's a good thing he doesn't use it to get out of political jams. McCain doesn't need that, he's got all that experience and stuff.

OK, so maybe he plays the POW card occasionally -- and, by "occasionally," I mean constantly. Even when it doesn't make any damned sense.

Huffington Post:

Facing a Democratic Party positively giddy over his recent admission that he didn't know how many houses he owned, John McCain quickly returned to a political trump card: his POW experience.

Speaking to the Washington Post, aide Brian Rogers, in full damage-control mode, acknowledged that his boss had "some investment properties and stuff," but added: "This is a guy who lived in one house for five and a half years -- in prison."


And this has what to do with anything? That's nothing even close to a rebuttal -- that's a dodge. Team McCain also played the POW card when he was busted for cheating at Rick Warren's Saddleback forum. "The insinuation from the Obama campaign that John McCain, a former prisoner of war, cheated is outrageous," the McCain campaign responded.

What?

Sometimes, McCain's use of the POW card is about the worst argument possible, Taking flack for his position on health care reform from Elizabeth Edwards, Team McCain pointed out that their candidate knew what it was like to get bad care "from another government." In other words, if it's better than what a freakin' POW got from the Viet Cong, your health care is fine -- now quit whining. Talk about setting the bar low.

The reason this is happening is the same reason why GOP campaigns have taken the low road in recent decades -- their arguments suck. They can't possibly win on the issues, so the campaign isn't about the issues. It's about the fact that John Kerry windsurfs, that Barack Obama eats arugula, that Bill Clinton was "too slick," that Michael Dukakis looked stupid in a tank. It's "who would you rather have a beer with?"

It's not about ideas, because Republican ideas are all losers -- this year especially. Once every four years, Republicans treat Americans like children and the office of the President of the United States of America as the prize in a personality contest. It's ironic and hypocritical that McCain's busy accusing Obama of celebrity when he's busy running as America's Most Famous Veteran -- complete with appearances on Saturday Night Live, Letterman, and Leno.

McCain always likes to point out when he's about to give you some of his patented "straight talk," so let me take it for a spin -- I'm going to give you some straight talk. If this sort of thing -- that Obama eats arugula and is an elitist -- is what's going to decide your vote for you, you're a freakin' moron. If you're going to vote for the person you'd most like to have a beer with, you're a chump. If you're going to vote for McCain because he was a POW and he "deserves" it, you're three pints of smart in a fifty-gallon drum, with stupid making up the difference. The election is about who can do the goddam job, not about who's the friendliest guy. If you don't understand that, you shouldn't be allowed to handle anything sharper than an underinflated beachball.

There's your straight talk; notice how little you liked it. For the record, "straight talk" doesn't mean "a line of BS you want to hear." If the only answer John McCain has to criticism, if the only argument he has for his presidency, is "I was a POW," then he doesn't have any answers and he doesn't have an argument.

Cleaning up the huge mess the last guy everyone wanted to have a beer with is going to be a big job. It's going to take the smartest guy. Playing the POW card isn't going to get you out of anything when your sitting behind that desk in the Oval Office. It's an intellectually lazy and emotionally manipulative device designed to avoid tough questions. If it's the best McCain can come up with, then he can't come up with anything.

-Wisco

Thursday, November 15, 2007

When is an Epidemic not an Epidemic?

The TimesOnline gets right to the lead:

More American military veterans have been committing suicide than US soldiers have been dying in Iraq, it was claimed yesterday.


What TimesOnline is relaying is a CBS News story on what's finally being labeled a "suicide epidemic" among veterans. While the rate for all vets is higher than the rest of the population, one group stood out.

...Veterans aged 20 through 24, those who have served during the war on terror. They had the highest suicide rate among all veterans, estimated between two and four times higher than civilians the same age. (The suicide rate for non-veterans is 8.3 per 100,000, while the rate for veterans was found to be between 22.9 and 31.9 per 100,000.)

"Wow! Those are devastating," said Paul Sullivan, a former VA analyst who is now an advocate for veterans rights from the group Veterans For Common Sense.


Contrast that with the comment by Dr. Ira Katz, mental health head at the Department of Veterans Affairs. Katz told CBS, "There is no epidemic in suicide in the VA, but suicide is a major problem."

Executive Director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America Paul Rieckhoff has written about the problem of suicides among vets for some time. In August, he wrote for Military.com, "Our troops are facing serious mental health problems, and they aren't getting the treatment they need. At least one-in-three Iraq veterans and one-in-nine Afghanistan veterans will face a mental health issue like depression, anxiety, or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. About 25 percent of those who committed suicide had 'a history of at least one psychiatric disorder.'"

The VA is notorious for ignoring problems that are a result of war. Between 1962 and 1971, troops in Vietnam were exposed to the herbicide Agent Orange. When these vets started developing health problems, the VA and the government ignored them. They were "crazy Vietnam vets." Never mind that Agent Orange contained a form of dioxin -- the most toxic compound on Earth -- it wasn't until the 1980s that the VA started taking vets exposed to it seriously. Most think they're still not doing enough.

When veterans of the first Gulf war started reporting their own problems, the phenomenon was given a name -- Gulf War Syndrome. These vets were told that their disease didn't exist, despite being exposed to depleted uranium (in civilian life known as "nuclear waste") on an almost daily basis.

So it's not extremely surprising to find the VA dragging its feet and denying that an epidemic of suicides represents a suicide epidemic. Like Agent Orange and Gulf War Syndrome before it, the military's suicide problem is a problem that will eventually just go away. That's the advantage of being an institution -- you can always win the waiting game. The Veterans' Administration will still be around long after all these vets are gone. That's one way to "solve" these sort of problems. If you ignore them, they literally go away. You just have to outlive the veterans.

Sen. Daniel Akaka, chairman of the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, sent the following statement to CBS, in response to their story:

The report that the rate of suicide among veterans is double that of the general population is deeply troubling and simply unacceptable. I am especially concerned that so many young veterans appear to be taking their own lives. For too many veterans, returning home from battle does not bring an end to conflict. There is no question that action is needed.


The question isn't whether action is needed -- that it is is pretty much unquestionable. The question is whether action will happen. Given the VA's history with these sort of issues, I'm pretty confident in saying that nothing will happen without a swift kick in someone's ass.

But the real question is what is the occupation of Iraq worth? It doesn't really serve any purpose at this point -- other than making sure some future president "loses the war" after Bush is gone. This problem will continue long into our future and, the longer we do this, the larger the problem becomes. Is "winning the war" for the sake of winning a war worth it? Because that's the only thing this war is about anymore -- and that's being a cockeyed optimist about it.

The Congress is playing games with Bush again, passing legislation in the House to impose a timetable on the war. Bush will veto it -- if it gets that far. The Senate isn't expected to pass it. Clearly, the only way to end this war is to defund it. Screwing around with legislation that's not going to go anywhere is pointless.

Meanwhile, the war goes on -- pointlessly and stupidly and in no one's interest other than Bush's. Meanwhile, 2.4 Americans a day die in combat. Meanwhile, 17 veterans a day commit suicide. Meanwhile, Iraqis are killed every day and the middle east becomes more and more destabilized, making us less safe and more hated in the world. Meanwhile, we accomplish nothing. Not anything good, anyway.

It's just not worth it.

--Wisco

Technorati tags: ; ; ; ; Will solve the problem of vet by waiting vets out?