NBC News' First Read: How low can President Obama and Congress go? We’re watching both continue to sink in polls. A Quinnipiac survey released yesterday found that Obama’s approval rating had dropped to 39%, which is his lowest point in that poll (we’re in Bush territory, folks). More ominously, just 44% said the president was honest and trustworthy -- yet another all-time low -- compared with 52% who disagreed. Meanwhile, Gallup showed that Congress’ job-approval rating had declined to a mere 9%, which is the lowest mark in the poll’s 39-year history of asking that question. This race to the bottom isn’t new, of course. Our NBC/WSJ poll released late last month -- after the government shutdown, after the standoff over the debt limit, and after a month’s worth of reported problems with the federal health-care website -- also found Obama (42% approval) and the Republican Party (22%-53% fav/unfav) reaching all-time lows. But what these new polls show is that the slides don’t appear to be stopping.So free falling Republican of free falling Obama? I think most thinking people would rather be in the President's position right now. There's usually a second term slump, when the president becomes emblematic of the status quo -- and this is probably one of the more extreme examples of that -- but congress doesn't have that excuse. First Read speculates on what this means for the midterms and largely ends with a shrug, but there's a really good small scale experiment out there that's just concluded and is nearly a perfect representation of what many 2014 voters will face; i.e., given a choice between two candidates who suck and who voters hate, which would they choose?
Search Archives:
Custom Search
Showing posts with label Virginia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Virginia. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
2014 and the Virginian Microcosm
The President is facing record low approvals -- which makes him the most popular man in Washington. Observe:
Posted by
Wisco
at
10:35 AM
2014 and the Virginian Microcosm
2013-11-13T10:35:00-06:00
Wisco
democrat|election 2014|news|Politics|poll|republican|Tea Party|Virginia|
Comments
Labels:
democrat,
election 2014,
news,
Politics,
poll,
republican,
Tea Party,
Virginia
Wednesday, November 06, 2013
No, the Libertarian Candidate Did Not Cost Cuccinelli Virginia
Last night was not a good night for the Republican base. Sure, Chris Christie won big, but the base hates Christie. He signed a gun control bill into law (yeah, it was extremely limited, but any regulation at all is considered sacrilegious treason to the 'baggers). He's open to the idea that global warming is real and that humans are driving it. And, the very worst sin, he basically betrayed Mitt Romney right before the election -- getting plenty of photo ops with Barack Obama after Hurricane Sandy. He even praised the President in a way that would be very easy to misunderstand as an endorsement. And he dissed Romney along the way, saying he "didn't give a damn" about getting a photo op with him. Tea Partiers will not celebrate Christie's win, because they don't consider him to be an actual conservative.
Another high-profile race was down in Virginia, where the media narrative has Democrat Terry McAuliffe "barely" defeating Republican Ken Cuccinelli. It was closer than the polls had predicted, but with a nearly 3 point difference between the two candidates, the race is not remotely close enough for a recount under Virginia law. McAuliffe's win is solid and decisive. He put this thing to bed.
Immediately following Cuccinelli's loss, 'baggers took to Twitter to pile on Libertarian candidate Robert Sarvis for stealing votes from Cuccinelli and costing him the race. But this particular bit of sore loserism is BS and is based on teabaggers' conception of Libertarianism. They think Libertarians are the Ron and Rand Paul types, who worry only about white, straight, evangelical male liberty and not so much about female, minority, and LGBT liberties. When actual, honest-to-goodness Libertarians got a look at Ken Cuccinelli -- who wants to make abortion illegal, ban certain sexual activities, and crack down on the Homosexual Menace -- they found they weren't exactly fans. Actual Libertarians vote against authoritarianism -- in fact, being against authoritarianism is what they're all about. According to CNN, "[I]f Sarvis had not been in the race, exit polls indicate McAuliffe would have beaten Cuccinelli by 7 points (50%-43%)." Those Libertarians, being the real deal and not just Republicans playing dress up, wouldn't have voted Cuccinelli in a million years.
The third party candidate didn't fracture the conservative vote as much as he divided the liberal vote. Instead of blaming Sarvis for their loss, wingnuts should be applauding him for coming within shouting distance of handing Cuccinelli an upset victory.
Another high-profile race was down in Virginia, where the media narrative has Democrat Terry McAuliffe "barely" defeating Republican Ken Cuccinelli. It was closer than the polls had predicted, but with a nearly 3 point difference between the two candidates, the race is not remotely close enough for a recount under Virginia law. McAuliffe's win is solid and decisive. He put this thing to bed.
Immediately following Cuccinelli's loss, 'baggers took to Twitter to pile on Libertarian candidate Robert Sarvis for stealing votes from Cuccinelli and costing him the race. But this particular bit of sore loserism is BS and is based on teabaggers' conception of Libertarianism. They think Libertarians are the Ron and Rand Paul types, who worry only about white, straight, evangelical male liberty and not so much about female, minority, and LGBT liberties. When actual, honest-to-goodness Libertarians got a look at Ken Cuccinelli -- who wants to make abortion illegal, ban certain sexual activities, and crack down on the Homosexual Menace -- they found they weren't exactly fans. Actual Libertarians vote against authoritarianism -- in fact, being against authoritarianism is what they're all about. According to CNN, "[I]f Sarvis had not been in the race, exit polls indicate McAuliffe would have beaten Cuccinelli by 7 points (50%-43%)." Those Libertarians, being the real deal and not just Republicans playing dress up, wouldn't have voted Cuccinelli in a million years.
The third party candidate didn't fracture the conservative vote as much as he divided the liberal vote. Instead of blaming Sarvis for their loss, wingnuts should be applauding him for coming within shouting distance of handing Cuccinelli an upset victory.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
Cuccinelli Demonstrates GOP's Crisis with Women Voters
It's a poll that should scare the Bejeezus out of every teabagging Republican everywhere in the nation. At first glance, it's just another survey showing former Hillary campaign manager Terry McAuliffe pummeling Republican state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli in the Virginia governor's race. The trend is now so well set that that part of it comes as no surprise at all. But the big story is why he's losing so badly.
Washington Post: Democrat Terry McAuliffe has opened a double-digit lead over Republican Ken Cuccinelli II in the race for Virginia governor, in a new poll capturing increasing dissatisfaction among voters with Cuccinelli’s party and his conservative views.Cuccinelli is a religious right figure, as well as a Tea Party type -- and despite the teabaggers' insistence that they're a secular movement driven by economic concerns, Cuccinelli is what they all are. And what they all are is a pack of religious, as well as political, extremists. Ken Cuccinelli's big claim to fame is his crusade to save sodomy laws as a work-around to make homosexuality illegal.
According to a new Washington Post/Abt SRBI poll, McAuliffe tops Cuccinelli 51?percent to 39?percent among likely voters in the Nov. 5 election. McAuliffe led by eight percentage points in a poll taken last month. Libertarian Robert Sarvis, who has capitalized on voter unrest with the two major-party candidates, is at 8 percent, according to the new poll.
The margin between the two major-party candidates is driven by a huge gender gap. Among men, the two candidates are running even, with Cuccinelli at 45 percent and McAuliffe at 44 percent. But among women, Cuccinelli trails by 24 points — 58 percent to 34 percent.
Wednesday, October 09, 2013
GOP's Rebranding Hits a Snag or 'How Republicans Screwed the Cooch'
Another day, another poll showing the GOP taking the blame for the government shutdown. How's that big rebranding effort going, guys?
Associated Press: Americans are holding Republicans primarily responsible for the partial government shutdown as public esteem sinks for all players in the impasse, President Barack Obama among them, according to a new poll. It's a struggle with no heroes.Granted, no one comes out of this smelling like a rose. But the weight of all that "you suck!" is being shouldered mostly be Republicans. Barack Obama's approvals are underwater; 53% disapprove of the way the President is handling the situation and only 37% approve. But that just makes him the most popular man in Washington. Only 5% approve of the job congress is doing.
The Associated Press-GfK survey, out Wednesday, affirms expectations by many in Washington — Republicans among them — that the GOP may end up taking the biggest hit in public opinion from the fiscal paralysis, just as that party did when much of the government closed 17 years ago. But the situation is fluid nine days into the shutdown and there's plenty of disdain to go around.
Overall, 62 percent mainly blamed Republicans for the shutdown. About half said Obama or the Democrats in Congress bear much responsibility.
Posted by
Wisco
at
10:18 AM
GOP's Rebranding Hits a Snag or 'How Republicans Screwed the Cooch'
2013-10-09T10:18:00-05:00
Wisco
government shutdown|news|Politics|poll|republican|Tea Party|Virginia|
Comments
Labels:
government shutdown,
news,
Politics,
poll,
republican,
Tea Party,
Virginia
Monday, February 27, 2012
An Astonishingly Poor Opinion of Women

ThinkProgress:
When a woman in Alabama seeks an abortion procedure, she already has to sign [pdf] that her doctor has performed an ultrasound and that she either viewed the ultrasound image or rejected seeing it. But state Sen. Clay Scofield (R) is pushing SB 12, a bill in the Alabama legislature that would mandate the physician “to perform an ultrasound [pdf], provide verbal explanation of the ultrasound, and display the images to the pregnant woman before performing an abortion.” The physician could also require the woman to submit to a transvaginal ultrasound — “in which a probe is inserted into the vagina, and then moved around until an ultrasound image is produced” — if she or he determines it necessary.
A Senate committee voted 4-1 on Friday to approve the measure, and the state Senate is expected to vote on it early this week. Even though studies have proven that viewing an ultrasound does not lead women to not have abortions, the bill’s sponsor says he hopes it will...
After Virginia Republicans were forced to remove the transvaginal ultrasound measure from their pointless bill, Alabama's going to go ahead and give it a shot. Identical bills in two states? Like the so-called "life amendment," his has ALEC written all over it. So much for "local control"; Washington lobbyists now write state laws and local legislative puppets just introduce and vote for them.
Posted by
Wisco
at
12:33 PM
An Astonishingly Poor Opinion of Women
2012-02-27T12:33:00-06:00
Wisco
abortion|Alabama|Bob McDonnell|Clay Scofield|news|Politics|religious right|republican|Ultrasound|Virginia|
Comments
Labels:
abortion,
Alabama,
Bob McDonnell,
Clay Scofield,
news,
Politics,
religious right,
republican,
Ultrasound,
Virginia
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Powell, McCain, Division, and Hate
In conversation, I've called Colin Powell a "politician in rehab." He was instrumental in bringing us to war with Iraq, despite any reservations he later claimed to have. The time to stop a disaster is before it happens, rather than after. Shaking your head in disapproval when it all goes to hell doesn't actually do anything all that helpful.
Still, Powell enjoys a measure of respect that few, if any, former Bush administration officials share. Justly or unjustly, Powell is seen by many Americans as "the good one" from Bush's first term.
So it is that Powell's endorsement of Barack Obama is seen as perhaps being more influential than most. Newspaper endorsements, celebrity endorsements, endorsements from colleagues; these generally don't do much to change people's minds. Not that they're totally without benefit -- each endorsement is a news story and all of these stories keep the endorsed candidate in TV news rotation. It counts for something, maybe a bump, but beyond that, probably not much else.
But Powell's endorsement came with an indictment. And that's what's going to hurt. He slammed McCain as erratic and scattershot, displaying no leadership during the credit crisis as he ran from gimmick to gimmick, trying to exploit it for political gain. He tore into his selection of Sarah Palin as not being prepared to become president -- which, as Powell put it, was almost the only job the VP's required to do.
But it was the ugliness of McCain's campaign that really got Powell's attention. While the press has been reporting some of it, it's hard to get them to go in depth. The media seems to believe that they have to find something just as bad from the Obama camp before they'll report on something from the McCain camp. Of course, this leads to false equivalencies and it downplays the outrageousness of McCain supporters by comparing it with things that, when you get right down to it, aren't all that bad. If some McCain supporter calls Obama a Muslim terrorist, some Obama supporter makes fun of McCain's age. Not really the same sort of thing.
And it was that "Muslim terrorist" thing that attracted Powell's attention. He found it offensive, perhaps as a minority, but also as an American. I got this quote from Glenn Greenwald (who also has the video):
Powell then went on to cite this photo:

Elsheba Khan lost her son Kareem in Iraq. That photo is at his grave in Arlington National Cemetery. When a woman in an audience told John McCain Barack Obama was "an Arab" (i.e., a Muslim), McCain took the microphone from her, shook his head with all the gravity he could sum up and told her, "No, ma'am. He's a decent family man, [a] citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues and that's what this campaign's all about. He's not." He's not a Muslim or an Arab, he's a "decent family man." Even in this (perhaps manufactured) attempt to rid his campaign rallies of their reputation for hate speech, McCain blew it by engaging in a backhanded smear of his own.
Is that what Elsheba Khan deserves? Is that what Specialist Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan deserves? And it's not just Muslim Americans who are the targets of this "us against them" tactic to set American against American. Sarah Palin has spoken of the "pro-America" parts of the country who will, you've got to assume, vote for John McCain. McCain adviser Nancy Pfotenhauer said that Democrats had moved into Virginia from out of state and that the "real Virginia" would vote for McCain. It begs the question; is Arlington National Cemetery in the "real" Virginia? A lot of people have moved from the "anti-American" parts of the country to spend eternity there.
Chauvinism of one type or another is rampant in the McCain campaign -- if you're not from a small town, you're not American. If you want a middle class tax cut, you're a socialist. If you've been through some sort of higher education, you're an elitist. If you're a Muslim, you're automatically a terrorist.
This is costing McCain dearly, because it's really pissing those of us who've been labeled as "un-American" off. But never let it be said that anyone on the right ever learns a damned thing from their mistakes. When Powell endorsed Obama, we got this:

That's Benedict Arnold -- a man whose name is synonymous with treason -- in blackface. Below, the caption reads "Benedict Powell... Race Patriot." Blacks join city-dwellers, parts of America, parts of Virginia, Muslims, and other demographics in the "not a real American" category. That image comes from syndicated cartoonist Gordon Campbell, who said that Powell endorsed Obama because he "wishes to see someone who looks like himself in the White House."
Not surprisingly, Rush Limbaugh jumped in, saying that the endorsement was "totally about race." Fellow right wing talker Mike Gallagher agrees, saying "race is the factor I think that drives much of this" and that Powell is "enamored and in love with the concept of a black man being president of these United States." He also accuses Powell of stupidity, saying he lacks the "intellectual capacity to, you know, make a distinction and realize the difference" between Obama and the "long list of black Americans who would make fine presidential candidates."
What all of these freakin' mind readers are missing is that McCain didn't fail to get Powell's endorsement, he lost it -- thanks in part to idiotic statements by dumbass supporters like Campbell, Gallagher, and Limbaugh.
Powell gave the legal maximum to McCain, $2,300. While a Powell spokesperson made it clear it wasn't an endorsement, it's pretty much as close to one as you can possibly get. Powell used to be for McCain. Then the Republican candidate -- and his idiot, divisive, bigoted supporters -- blew it. In trying to bump up McCain's poll numbers and rationalize his failures, they've chased away conservatives like Colin Powell with stupidity, smears, and empty wedge issues.
Which is why Powell's endorsement may matter more than most. In reaction, the McCain campaign and his supporters have proved every damned thing Powell said. Worse, they all seem to be constitutionally unable to see this. Having made the mistake that lost them Colin Powell, their response to his endorsement of Barack Obama is to make that same goddam mistake again and again and again.
If you don't believe that these people are too dishonest to run the nation; if you think they're not too erratic, too divisive, or too bigoted, then consider this...
They're too damned stupid to learn from their own mistakes.
-Wisco
Still, Powell enjoys a measure of respect that few, if any, former Bush administration officials share. Justly or unjustly, Powell is seen by many Americans as "the good one" from Bush's first term.
So it is that Powell's endorsement of Barack Obama is seen as perhaps being more influential than most. Newspaper endorsements, celebrity endorsements, endorsements from colleagues; these generally don't do much to change people's minds. Not that they're totally without benefit -- each endorsement is a news story and all of these stories keep the endorsed candidate in TV news rotation. It counts for something, maybe a bump, but beyond that, probably not much else.
But Powell's endorsement came with an indictment. And that's what's going to hurt. He slammed McCain as erratic and scattershot, displaying no leadership during the credit crisis as he ran from gimmick to gimmick, trying to exploit it for political gain. He tore into his selection of Sarah Palin as not being prepared to become president -- which, as Powell put it, was almost the only job the VP's required to do.
But it was the ugliness of McCain's campaign that really got Powell's attention. While the press has been reporting some of it, it's hard to get them to go in depth. The media seems to believe that they have to find something just as bad from the Obama camp before they'll report on something from the McCain camp. Of course, this leads to false equivalencies and it downplays the outrageousness of McCain supporters by comparing it with things that, when you get right down to it, aren't all that bad. If some McCain supporter calls Obama a Muslim terrorist, some Obama supporter makes fun of McCain's age. Not really the same sort of thing.
And it was that "Muslim terrorist" thing that attracted Powell's attention. He found it offensive, perhaps as a minority, but also as an American. I got this quote from Glenn Greenwald (who also has the video):
I'm also troubled by, not what Sen. McCain says, but what members of the party say, and it is permitted to be said such things as: "Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim." Well, the correct answer is: he is not a Muslim. He's a Christian. He's always been a Christian.
But the really right answer is: What if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer is: No, that's not America. Is there something wrong with some 7-year-old Muslim-American kid believing he or she can be President?
Yet I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion: he's a Muslim, and he might be associated with terrorists. This is not the way we should be doing it in America.
Powell then went on to cite this photo:

Elsheba Khan lost her son Kareem in Iraq. That photo is at his grave in Arlington National Cemetery. When a woman in an audience told John McCain Barack Obama was "an Arab" (i.e., a Muslim), McCain took the microphone from her, shook his head with all the gravity he could sum up and told her, "No, ma'am. He's a decent family man, [a] citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues and that's what this campaign's all about. He's not." He's not a Muslim or an Arab, he's a "decent family man." Even in this (perhaps manufactured) attempt to rid his campaign rallies of their reputation for hate speech, McCain blew it by engaging in a backhanded smear of his own.
Is that what Elsheba Khan deserves? Is that what Specialist Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan deserves? And it's not just Muslim Americans who are the targets of this "us against them" tactic to set American against American. Sarah Palin has spoken of the "pro-America" parts of the country who will, you've got to assume, vote for John McCain. McCain adviser Nancy Pfotenhauer said that Democrats had moved into Virginia from out of state and that the "real Virginia" would vote for McCain. It begs the question; is Arlington National Cemetery in the "real" Virginia? A lot of people have moved from the "anti-American" parts of the country to spend eternity there.
Chauvinism of one type or another is rampant in the McCain campaign -- if you're not from a small town, you're not American. If you want a middle class tax cut, you're a socialist. If you've been through some sort of higher education, you're an elitist. If you're a Muslim, you're automatically a terrorist.
This is costing McCain dearly, because it's really pissing those of us who've been labeled as "un-American" off. But never let it be said that anyone on the right ever learns a damned thing from their mistakes. When Powell endorsed Obama, we got this:

That's Benedict Arnold -- a man whose name is synonymous with treason -- in blackface. Below, the caption reads "Benedict Powell... Race Patriot." Blacks join city-dwellers, parts of America, parts of Virginia, Muslims, and other demographics in the "not a real American" category. That image comes from syndicated cartoonist Gordon Campbell, who said that Powell endorsed Obama because he "wishes to see someone who looks like himself in the White House."
Not surprisingly, Rush Limbaugh jumped in, saying that the endorsement was "totally about race." Fellow right wing talker Mike Gallagher agrees, saying "race is the factor I think that drives much of this" and that Powell is "enamored and in love with the concept of a black man being president of these United States." He also accuses Powell of stupidity, saying he lacks the "intellectual capacity to, you know, make a distinction and realize the difference" between Obama and the "long list of black Americans who would make fine presidential candidates."
What all of these freakin' mind readers are missing is that McCain didn't fail to get Powell's endorsement, he lost it -- thanks in part to idiotic statements by dumbass supporters like Campbell, Gallagher, and Limbaugh.
CNN, August 9, 2007:
CNN has learned the presidential campaign of Sen. John McCain received a check Wednesday from former Secretary of State Colin Powell, providing a symbolic boost to the Arizona Republican's struggling White House bid.
McCain spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker confirmed the contribution, telling CNN, "The Senator appreciates the support of General Powell." Powell's office did not return calls seeking comment.
According to a review of Federal Election Commission records, Powell has not donated to any other candidate this year.
Powell gave the legal maximum to McCain, $2,300. While a Powell spokesperson made it clear it wasn't an endorsement, it's pretty much as close to one as you can possibly get. Powell used to be for McCain. Then the Republican candidate -- and his idiot, divisive, bigoted supporters -- blew it. In trying to bump up McCain's poll numbers and rationalize his failures, they've chased away conservatives like Colin Powell with stupidity, smears, and empty wedge issues.
Which is why Powell's endorsement may matter more than most. In reaction, the McCain campaign and his supporters have proved every damned thing Powell said. Worse, they all seem to be constitutionally unable to see this. Having made the mistake that lost them Colin Powell, their response to his endorsement of Barack Obama is to make that same goddam mistake again and again and again.
If you don't believe that these people are too dishonest to run the nation; if you think they're not too erratic, too divisive, or too bigoted, then consider this...
They're too damned stupid to learn from their own mistakes.
-Wisco
Labels:
2008,
Barack Obama,
elections,
hate,
Islam,
John McCain,
Media,
Military,
Politics,
propaganda,
racism,
republican,
Sarah Palin,
Virginia
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Senate GOP Going Down the Series of Tubes
Yesterday turned out to be a bad day for Republicans in Washington. Alaska Senator Ted Stevens found himself into a little trouble. Stevens, who'd made himself famous with a bridge to nowhere and his assertion that the internet is "not a big truck. It's a series of tubes," was indicted on seven felony counts of concealing $250,000 in gifts and services given to him by an oil company."This is very bad for the party," a retiring GOP Senator told Politico. "The timing on this couldn’t be worse." According to Politico's piece, "Now, there’s an arrest warrant out for the 84-year-old senator. He’s been stripped of his top committee rankings. His iconic career is crumbling. His hopes for reelection are in serious doubt.
"And Senate Republicans have no idea what to do about it. "
Of course, the "what to do about it" question isn't so much about pulling Stevens' fat out of the fire, it's about their own political careers. Republicans, never ones to embrace the "we're all in this together" mindset, have adopted as their motto "every man for himself!"
The indictment pretty much pounds the final nail in the coffin containing Stevens' reelection prospects. He was nine points down in polling against rival Mark Begich, Mayor of Anchorage, before the indictment. To give you an idea of how far Ted has fallen in public opinion, Stevens was reelected six years ago with a nearly unheard of 78%.
The series of tubes has been abuzz with the news of Stevens' fall. Republican chances in November, which had previously seemed as if they couldn't possibly be worse, had just gotten worse. Carpetbagger Report's Steve Benen sent an internet reading, "As for the big picture, I think it’s fair to say the Republicans’ Culture of Corruption hasn’t been front-page news for a while, but it hasn’t gone away, either."
Which is the real problem this year, helping to explain why Barack Obama's message of change has been a winner. Scandals and outrages and crimes follow Republicans everywhere they go.
And it's costing them. In another piece, Politico finds that nine Republican Senate seats are extremely competitive -- including Stevens'. They are Virginia, New Mexico, Alaska, New Hampshire, Colorado, Oregon, North Carolina, Mississippi, and Maine. Many of these states are also expected to go for Obama, which -- because of a coattail effect -- makes it that much more of an uphill battle for the GOP.
To give you an idea of just how desperate the GOP is this year, I give you this story from Virginia:
[Chairman of the Republican Party Jeff] Frederick is calling on Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) and Attorney General Robert F. McDonnell (R) to launch an investigation. Frederick is also urging residents to avoid giving their names or social security numbers to canvassers seeking to register voters.
"Identity theft is widespread problem in Virginia," Frederick said. "Today, I am encouraging voters who have filed out any of these voter registration forms to immediately contact their registrars, and Virginians should exercise caution when approached by a stranger who asks them for their information."
Frederick's warning comes as Obama is deploying volunteers across Virginia to try to register 151,000 new voters by the Oct 6 deadline. Various non-profit organizations are also trying to register new voters, especially African-Americans.
That's right, the Armies of the Unholy Obama are massed on the Virginia border and the best the Republican party can come up with to forestall imminent doom is to discourage people from registering to vote. The problem, ID theft isn't a widespread problem in Virginia. Called on his claim, Chairman Frederick refused to answer.
This shows a party out of ammo. There are no arguments left for Republican ideology. And, where there are no arguments, there are only defenses. These defenses can be rhetorical or they can just be dirty tricks. TIME's Karen Tumulty called Frederick's move the "Sleazy Campaign Tactic of the Day." People without ethics or morals are guaranteed to cheat. The unscrupulous and the shameless have only their lack of scruples and shame for strengths -- witness Karl Rove. Their arguments are disproved, their claims of moral superiority have been shown to be lies, and the shallowness of their patriotism (an issue they claim to own) is revealed in their deep, deep contempt for democratic principles.
So, if you can't win the debate, you don't have one. If at all possible, shut it down. Which, of course, is part of the Republican problem this year; people don't actually like that approach -- only 27% of voters identify themselves as Republican this year. Senate Republicans, who've used the filibuster more than any Senate session in history, hope they can filibuster the elections.
With Ted Stevens reminding voters of rampant Republican corruption, it's pretty much the only chance they have.
-Wisco
Technorati tags: politics; corruption; crime; scandal; Virginia; voting; Alaska; Ted Stevens; Senate Republicans are so screwed in the 2008 elections
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





